Sector-Specific
Engagement Models
Generic penetration testing leaves the regulator question unanswered. Each brief below describes the regulatory landscape, the cadence the regulator expects, the artefacts the auditor will request, the sector-specific threats your attackers actually use, and the AxVeil engagement shape that delivers against all of it.
Regulated finance
Deepest compliance loadBanking, fintech and insurance carry the heaviest regulatory load and the most targeted threat surface — BEC and payment fraud, API and open-banking abuse, broker / agent account takeover, and ransomware against the operational core. Each brief maps every finding to the source rule.
Banks, fintech & insurtech
MENA banking experience (SAMA, CBUAE, QCB), fintech / insurtech advisory and pre-regulator readiness, and payment-security depth for regulated institutions. SWIFT CSP, payment-rail VAPT, API and open-banking abuse testing, internal AD red team.
Read the brief →EMEA fintech, PSPs, EMIs & CASPs
PSD2 RTS on Strong Customer Authentication and secure communication, the PSD3 / PSR transition, EU GDPR with the EDPB PSD2-interplay guidance, DORA Article 26 threat-led penetration testing aligned to TIBER-EU, MiCAR for CASPs, and FCA / BaFin / DNB / CSSF supervisory expectations.
Read the brief →Insurers, reinsurers, brokers & insurtech
IRDAI Information & Cybersecurity Guidelines 2023 (annual VAPT, app-security assessment, six-hour reporting), NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law, EU IDD, GDPR / DPDP. Broker-portal ATO, claims-platform fraud logic, reinsurance ledger trust boundaries — the highest-impact insurance attack surface.
Read the brief →Product, SaaS & consumer-tech
Series A–C SaaS
SOC 2 Type 2, customer security questionnaires, OWASP ASVS L2 across the production app, OWASP API Top 10 across REST / GraphQL, CIS Benchmarks across the AWS / Azure / GCP control plane. Built for the founder-CISO and the security-of-one team.
Read the brief →D2C brands & marketplace platforms
Series A+ Indian D2C, fashion, beauty, food, headless commerce and marketplace platforms. PCI DSS v4.0 where card data lands, DPDP Act 2023, fraud and abuse prevention, and the Flipkart / Amazon / Razorpay partner-program security audits procurement actually demands.
Read the brief →Hospitals, healthtech & medical devices
HIPAA Security Rule for US providers, GDPR Article 9 for EU patient data, FDA premarket cybersecurity guidance for connected medical devices. Patient-data threat modelling alongside the hospital network and the clinical workflow.
Read the brief →Retail & omnichannel commerce
PCI DSS v4.0 across POS, e-commerce and the tokenisation boundary, web-skimming / Magecart defence, bot and account-takeover abuse, and the loyalty / gift-card fraud surface that retail attackers monetise fastest.
Read the brief →EdTech & learning platforms
Children's-data obligations (DPDP §9, COPPA, FERPA, GDPR-K), exam-integrity and proctoring abuse, multi-tenant isolation across institutions, and the procurement security reviews schools and universities run before they buy.
Read the brief →Industrial, infrastructure & specialist
Media & entertainment
Pre-release content protection, DRM and watermarking integrity, subscriber-account fraud and credential-sharing abuse, and the API surface behind streaming, ticketing and rights-management platforms.
Read the brief →Legal services & law firms
Privileged-document confidentiality, matter-level access isolation, BEC and wire-fraud resistance on trust accounts, and the client security questionnaires that enterprise legal panels now run on outside counsel.
Read the brief →Manufacturing & industrial
IT/OT segmentation review, IEC 62443 alignment, ransomware-resilience on the plant network, and the supply-chain and vendor-access paths that drive the most damaging manufacturing intrusions.
Read the brief →Energy & utilities
Critical-infrastructure threat modelling, NCIIPC / NERC-CIP-style control expectations, SCADA / ICS testing under safe constraints, and IT-to-OT pivot paths against the operational core.
Read the brief →Automotive & connected vehicles
UNECE WP.29 / ISO 21434 alignment, telematics and connected-car API abuse, OTA-update integrity, and the supplier-tier security reviews OEMs cascade down the chain.
Read the brief →Why sector-specific matters
The technical work behind a credible offensive security engagement is largely the same across sectors — the OWASP ASVS controls do not change shape because the asset belongs to a D2C brand or a hospital. What changes is everything around the technical work: the regulator (or buyer) the report is written for, the cadence that audience expects, the format the inspection or procurement team will accept, the incident-notification timeline that overrides the engagement Rules of Engagement if something genuinely fails, and the policy documents the auditor will ask to see alongside the technical findings.
A Series-A SaaS chasing SOC 2 Type 2 needs ASVS L2 work mapped against AICPA Trust Services Criteria CC7.1 and CC8.1. A D2C brand carrying card data needs PCI DSS v4.0 SAQ-A or SAQ-D evidence depending on tokenisation depth, plus DPDP Act 2023 obligations on its Indian customer base. An EMEA payment institution needs PSD2 SCA-RTS conformance and a DORA Article 26 TLPT cycle. A MENA bank needs SAMA / CBUAE / QCB framework alignment. An insurer needs the IRDAI 2023 annual VAPT bundle and NAIC Model Law evidence. None of those are satisfied by a sector-agnostic report template.
Each industry brief below the fold describes the regulatory landscape with primary-source links, the sector-specific threats your adversaries actually run, the AxVeil engagement model tuned to that landscape, and the artefacts you will hand over to the auditor or procurement team at the end of the cycle. Pick the one that matches your buyer; the technical disciplines underneath — VAPT, red team, adversary simulation, compliance — are detailed in the service pages.
Don't see your exact sector?
We have delivered work in gaming, crypto / Web3 and adjacent verticals. Send the framework you need to satisfy and the asset surface in scope; we respond within one business day with the proposed contracting path and a fixed-fee quote.
Start the conversation →